BLACK SKIN ROYAL IDENTITY

Today the book went live, I went out and met some people and had a very positive experience. Some bought on the spot and that was very exciting. However a number wanted to go on Amazon to purchase the book and that was also encouraging.  You can too: https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_i_1_13?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=black+skin+royal+identity&sprefix=black+skin+ro%2Caps%2C165&crid=IR7UFLJRPOOO

A few who have read some of the extracts have liked them on FaceBook. Thank you for that. Here comes another Extract.

Black skin royal identity

EXTRACT:  Barriers to the progress of Hebrews
The hindrance to progress has been done using barriers to entry that cover up ancient Hebrew-Israelite History and stop access to information that would lead to self-awareness or a sense of national identity as a people.

1. The invading imposters have defaced artefacts that show Hebrews to be black skinned and hidden information that shows them as having led advanced civilisations before Europeans came out of caves (so called blacks having never lived in caves). I can only imagine this was done to obscure or bring into question the origins of the ancient black peoples and their cultures around the world.
2. Much confusion has been caused by European archaeologists ignoring any facts about Hebraic people that doesn't fit in with the lies or misdirected information they concocted to contradict the truth they find in the ground or in ancient documents in order to ensure information turns up or seemingly belongs to the wrong time period and therefore will not make sense to the casual seeker.
3. It is also noticeable as a barrier to understanding that White historians create different theories that allow them to downplay the facts about their past behaviour as a people in order to make slavery look less bad and justify what they did to Israelite-Hebrews e.g. The theory of evolution, white supremacy, atheism and survival of the fittest being examples of such psychological warfare.
4. There has been a clear barrier implemented to flood the world with the European perspective on history, archaeology and the "sciences so called", while repainting and reprinting everything that has not hitherto been whitewashed till it is almost all appearing in the image of the oppressor e.g. The blond haired, blue eyed, bleeding heart Jesus who never existed as this image is actually the picture of Cesar Borgio the illegitimate son of Pope Alexander VI first painted by Michael Angelo.

One example can be found on the website, “Snopes” we find: “Many image macros assert that Cesare Borgia was the son of a corrupt gangster, a criminal, a dictator, and a sexual deviant. Although Borgia is historically established as one of the likely illegitimate children of Pope Alexander VI (born Rodrigo Borgia), reference works describe the elder Borgia as a controversial Pope but not a “gangster.” It’s widely held that Pope Alexander VI’s checkered reign led in part to the backlash heralding the Protestant Reformation, but historical literature doesn’t describe him as a “dictator.” As for Cesare Borgia himself, he was born in 1476 and died at the age of 31 in 1507, so had his image been used as the model for Jesus in artworks created in or before 1490, those works would have been based on the features of a young teenager.”

1. They have changed the Hebraic names (meaning of names) and places from African ones, to Arabic or European ones so as to disguise their true ancient identity. So that names of people and places are not seen as Hebraic or even "so called black places". E.g. Egyptians are painted as Arabs or Europeans, but this is impossible since the land was once called Kemet (land of the blacks).
2. Europeans have changed the criteria for defining nations, especially Hebrew ones from being about where you are born, or originate, to how much black or white the blood you have in your veins is; i.e. things have been redefined from your nation to your race, except when it pertains to themselves e.g. The Europeans who invaded and colonised Australia and are seen as Australians when they were in point of fact from England while the historical indigenous people of the land whom they call Aboriginals as defined by their race, even though they are in fact actually the real Australians.
3. When reporting on Hebrew history, Europeans neglect to say what skin tone or hair type the original Hebrews had and never identify them as negro, dark skinned or original Hebrew, but leave it open so that the information can be interpreted as though it pertained to European.
4. Next, when it becomes wholly obvious what colour the Hebrews or any other African civilisations are or were, and the level of cultural advancement they had attained, they attribute those nations success to the influence of Europeans or at very least to the Arabs or other ethnicities aligned with the interests of Europeans.
5. When any other ancient historians of European descents or God forbid of black heritage attempt to be honest with the evidence they find concerning the ancient Hebrew Israelites, the Europeans (especially the so called Jews) will accuse them of being anti-Semitic, contradict them, seek to discredit them or seek to ruin them, especially when the information pertains to challenging the so called Jews of today about their ethnic honesty.

Whenever history is against the "so called Jews", or does not agree with their version of the story. Then because of their economic dominance they simply re-write history either incrementally or totally, using their publishing mechanisms which they own and control, to make changes happen (many people are not aware that most of the major publishing and media companies are owned by so called Jews.

visit the book page below and find out more from your own copy. Blessings

https://www.createspace.com/7117579